Thursday, January 8, 2015

Photo Number 1790

This is a photo from Craig’s Collection.

Forest Flowers Craigs

Forest Flowers Craigs back

Forrest Flowers

A relative of the Tucker Family

Forest Flowers Craigs

The photographer’s name is written in pencil.  Matthews I think.

I know that Jacqi has some Flowers in her list of relatives….wouldn’t it be cool if this was one!

Thanks for stopping by.

6 comments:

  1. Forrest Flower--- I like that

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So did a lot of Mr. and Mrs. Flowers... they named a lot children Forrest. I guess that is better than "Wild," "Sun," "Daisy" and many others!

      Delete
  2. I love his name and certainly hope this photo can be returned to the Flowers family.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Any idea of the date range? Too bad there wasn't an imprint for the photographer to get an idea of the geographic area.

    Sadly, among my many Flowers relatives in Ohio and beyond, there was no one named Forrest Flowers. I would have loved it if you had found a distant cousin's photo!

    Also, I tried searching online, but as Iggy mentioned, Forrest was a popular name for the Flowers clans around these here United States. I even tried searching for a Flowers with an in-law named Tucker--both on Ancestry and in obituary services--but no clear leads. Aargh! So close, yet so far away!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I would guess 1900 to 1910 sometime. I found more Tucker Relative Photos last night....so maybe someday some relatives will show up! :)

      Delete
  4. There is an imprint on the bottom left corner of the picture. And, from what I can tell from photos around the same time and older from in my family, the stamps have some sort of significance to the photos and the photographer. Maybe, if we can track down that stamp, we can figure out a time Era to help?

    ReplyDelete

Hi, Thanks for the comments, your input on these old photos is appreciated! English only please! All comments will be moderated! Connie